Concept Selection:
Desirable characteristics for any selection method:
What objections or concerns arise in your mind about using the concept selection matrix approach to selecting a plan?
Concept Scoring Matrix:
===========================================
Prototyping:
An approximation of the artifact on one or more dimensions of interest.
============================================
Focused vs. Comprehensive, Analytical vs. Physical Prototypes:
Analytical prototype:
===========================================
What are Prototypes Used For?
There are three main purposes we built prototypes,
An Analytical prototype for communication purpose:
A new revision and refinement of the prototype according to the user needs.
Final product:
==========================================
Scoop Example, Making Prototypes:
===========================================
Drawing with Emphasis and Detail (Visual Expression):
Line Weight:
Outlining and shading techniques:
But it's now time
to get serious. That is it's time
to apply logic and analysis in order to select a plan. In this section a left-brain method called the Concept Selection Matrix is explained.
Desirable characteristics for any selection method:
- The first motive
or the first desirable characteristic of selection method is that you get the right
answer.
Now, if you are designing something for yourself. That's not so hard. You just pick the solution concept that you like the best. But when you are designing for a large group of users, knowing which concept will best close the gap is often not so intuitive.
- It can communicate the logic behind the decision
- Its self documenting
=========================================
The Concept Selection Matrix:
The concept
selection matrix is a tool that lets us take a set of concepts, for instance, these
ten that we generated for the ice cream scoop example, and evaluate them in a way
that we can narrow the set of alternatives to a relatively few, that we could expand
on and evaluate further.
What objections or concerns arise in your mind about using the concept selection matrix approach to selecting a plan?
The more
left-brain among you, have at least two objections or concerns about this
method. The first is, you say, well, wait a second, this
implies that all of these criteria are equally important. What if I decide
that having the nice shape to the ball is not nearly as important as
having it be quick and easy. Wouldn't it make sense to somehow weight the quick and
easy greater than the nice shaped ball? And the answer is, absolutely.
Those of you who are more right-brain have two objections yourselves. The first is that, hey, wait a second. We can't really reduce everything in life to a quantitative evaluation and I'd really like to make a more holistic judgement of the qualities of these concept.
Those of you who are more right-brain have two objections yourselves. The first is that, hey, wait a second. We can't really reduce everything in life to a quantitative evaluation and I'd really like to make a more holistic judgement of the qualities of these concept.
I think it's good
discipline to see if you can get
the concept selection matrix to be consistent with your intuition then it's a nice way
of codifying what it is that you're intuition is telling you. And that will
serve well to document your results and to communicate to others.
===========================================Concept Scoring Matrix:
And the scoring
matrix is essentially a simple version of what's called multi-attribute
utility analysis.
===========================================
Prototyping:
An approximation of the artifact on one or more dimensions of interest.
============================================
Focused vs. Comprehensive, Analytical vs. Physical Prototypes:
We've defined
prototype as an approximation of an artifact on one or more dimensions
of interest and that last bit of that phrase, One or more
dimensions of interest, suggests that a prototype need not necessarily
approximate the artifact on all it's dimensions. And in fact, it's
useful to think about. Two extremes. At one extreme
Prototype can be very focused on one or a few dimensions of interest at the other
extreme, they can be comprehensive and that is, essentially capture most or
all of the aspects or dimensions of the artifact. Focused, physical design:
Analytical prototype:
===========================================
What are Prototypes Used For?
There are three main purposes we built prototypes,
- To answer questions
- To communicate
- To serve as milestones in the design process
There are usually
two main questions that you're trying to answer in design. The first
question is a question about the solution. It's basically,
will it work? And the second is a question about the need. And that is really, will the users like it?
An Analytical prototype for communication purpose:
A new revision and refinement of the prototype according to the user needs.
Third motive for
building prototypes is for use as milestones to manage the project (from concept to production). Now most of you
have heard of a beta prototype. Google
is famously known for, for identifying their products as beta or in beta even well
into their adoption. Google Gmail was considered in beta even after it had ten of millions of
users. That word is an example of a, It's a label
that's used on prototypes that are used as milestones.
The typical
labels used on a prototype are proof of concept, prototype, alpha prototype, beta
prototype and pre-production prototype. Those are typical
labels used. And often as consumers we just hear beta because beta is
the first version that's typically made public or shown to a large group of users.
==========================================
Scoop Example, Making Prototypes:
===========================================
Drawing with Emphasis and Detail (Visual Expression):
Line Weight:
Contour lines:
2D sketch:
3D sketch:
Outlining and shading techniques: